United States House Appropriators and Foreign Affairs leaders convened a rare joint briefing yesterday as part of a broader congressional investigation into what lawmakers and experts describe as escalating and targeted violence against Christians in Nigeria.
The session, led by House Appropriations Vice Chair and National Security Subcommittee Chairman Mario Díaz-Balart, R-Fla., is feeding into a comprehensive report ordered by President Donald Trump on recent massacres of Nigerian Christians and potential policy steps the U.S. could take to pressure Abuja to respond.
Trump directed Congress, led by Reps. Riley Moore, R-W.Va., and Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., to probe Christian persecution in Nigeria and produce a report for the White House to review.
He has floated the idea of taking direct military action against Islamists who kill.
Vicky Hartzler, chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, told lawmakers that “religious freedom [is] under siege,” citing the abduction of more than 300 children and attacks in which “radical Muslims kill entire Christian villages [and] burn churches.”
Rampant violations
She said violations were “rampant,” “violent,” and disproportionately affect Christians who, she argued, were targeted “at a 2.2 to 1 rate”, compared with Muslims.
Hartzler said Nigeria had taken some initial corrective steps, including reassigning about 100,000 police officers from VIP protection details but warned the country was entering a “coordinated and deeply troubling period of escalated violence.”
Targeted sanctions
She recommended targeted sanctions on Nigerian officials “who have demonstrated complicity,” visa restrictions, blocking U.S.-based assets, and conditioning foreign and humanitarian aid on measurable accountability.
She also urged Congress to direct the Government Accountability Office to conduct a review of past U.S. assistance, adding that Abuja should retake villages seized from Christian farming communities, so widows and children could return home.
Dr. Ebenezer Obadare of the Council on Foreign Relations offered the sharpest challenge to the Nigerian government’s claim that the violence was not religiously motivated.
He said the idea Boko Haram and other militant groups target Christians and Muslims equally is a “myth,” arguing the groups “act for one reason and one reason only: religion.”
Any higher Muslim casualty count, he said, reflected geography, not equal targeting.
Obadare described Boko Haram as fundamentally opposed to democracy and said the Nigerian military was “too corrupt and incompetent” to dismantle jihadist networks without strong external pressure.
He urged the U.S. to press the Nigerian government to disband armed groups enforcing Islamic law, confront corruption inside the security forces, and demonstrate genuine intent to curb religious violence.
He added that Washington should insist Nigerian officials respond immediately to early warnings of impending attacks.
Deadliest country
Sean Nelson of Alliance Defending Freedom International added that Nigeria was “the deadliest country in the world for Christians,” claiming more Christians were killed there than in all other countries combined and at a rate “five times” higher than Muslims when adjusted for population.
He said extremists also target Muslims who refuse to embrace their extreme ideology which, he argued, further undercut Abuja’s narrative that the crisis was driven mainly by criminality or local disputes.
With a population of more than 230 million, Nigeria’s vibrant and often turbulent cities and villages are home to people of strikingly diverse backgrounds.
The nation’s roughly 120 million-strong Muslim population dominates the north, while some 90 million Christians are centered in the southern half of the country.
Nelson urged tighter U.S. oversight of assistance to Nigeria, including routing some aid through faith-based organizations to avoid corruption.
Greater transparency
He called for greater transparency in how Abuja handles mass kidnappings and ransom payments, adding that sustained U.S. and international pressure was essential because “without transparency and outside pressure, nothing changes.”
Díaz-Balart criticised the Biden administration for reversing the Trump administration’s designation of Nigeria as a “country of particular concern” in 2021, arguing that the change had had “clearly deadly consequences.”
Lawmakers on the Appropriations, Foreign Affairs and Financial Services committees signalled additional oversight actions in the months ahead as they prepare the Trump-directed report to Congress.
Hartzler noted that Nigeria had recently begun taking several steps that could signal a shift toward confronting the crisis more directly.
She pointed to President Bola Tinubu’s decision to pull about 100,000 police officers from VIP bodyguard assignments and redistribute them across the country, calling it “a promising start after years of neglect.”
She said the move reflected growing recognition inside Nigeria’s political leadership that the violence had reached an intolerable level.
She also highlighted comments last week from Nigeria’s speaker of the House, who acknowledged the country was facing a “coordinated and deeply troubling period of escalated violence.”
Hartzler said that acknowledgment, coupled with a push from the Nigerian House majority leader for more intensive legislative oversight, suggested the government might finally be admitting the scale and severity of the attacks.
Even with these developments, Hartzler warned that the measures were far from sufficient.
She emphasised that the Nigerian government must show clear intent to “quell injustice,” act quickly when early warning signs of attacks appear, and commit to transparency and accountability if the recent steps would amount to meaningful progress.
The Nigerian Embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
